Let us start with science, about the creation and existence of our universe.
The Big Bang theory explains how the universe got created from a single point by high density and temperature. The whole thing is believed to have exploded from the single point and thereafter it started expanding ever since. The expansion continues, still.
NASA describes black hole as a space with such intense gravity that it even it pulls in the light into it. In the black hole, everything is squeezed into such a tiny space, into a single dot.
The quantum Physics hypothesizes that ALL elementary particles of matter are closed loops of waveform, with intense energy residing in it. By this hypothesis, matter & energy are identified to be two forms of one itself. This is now getting promulgated as ‘unified theory’. The latest experiments on this at CERN & other labs had generated excitement to all science lovers, world over.
Let us now dwell a while on the Indian spiritual explanation of the situation before the creation:
Nasadiya Sukta explains the origin of universe (verse 19:129 of Rig Ved). It says;
“There was neither non-existence nor existence then. Neither the realm of space nor the sky beyond. There was neither death nor immortality, neither night nor day, none breathed, for it was windless, and there was absolutely nothing beyond. In to the void, the force of heat came into being”
It then asks, “what stirred, where, in whose protection?”
It doesn’t ascribe the stirring to the Gods, as it says elsewhere that even Gods came after the creation.
The puranic Hindu cosmology view asserts that the universe is created, destroyed, and re-created in an eternally repetitive series of cycles.
The repeated (cyclic) creation, destruction & re-creation of universes is not asserted by science, yet. How do we explain the big bang theory and the black hole in the context of Hindu cosmology view? Or is it all an illusion (maya) of the mind and the sense organs?
Isn’t creation, destruction & re-creation similar to birth, death and re-birth?
Does it help connecting the dots? Aren’t we also part of the cycle?
Does it confuse us? Or, does it endorses Heinrich Heins, when he says, “sleep is good, death is better of course, the best thing would have been never born at all?
No comments:
Post a Comment